Texas Ed: Comments on Education from Texas

January 17, 2007

HB 557: Holding Parents Accountable

Filed under: Accountability, Parental Involvement, Teacher issues — texased @ 3:33 pm

80(R) HB 557 – Introduced version – Bill Text:

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to the failure of a parent to attend a public school parent-teacher conference; providing a criminal penalty.
�������BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: �������SECTION�1.��Chapter 26, Education Code, is amended by adding Section 26.014 to read as follows: �������Sec.�26.014.��FAILURE TO ATTEND PARENT-TEACHER CONFERENCE.
(a) A parent of a student commits an offense if:
�������������(1)��the parent receives written notice by certified mail of at least three proposed dates from which the parent can choose for scheduling a parent-teacher conference between the parent and the student’s teacher;
�������������(2)��the parent:
�������������������(A)��fails to respond to the notice; or
�������������������(B)��schedules a parent-teacher conference on one of the dates proposed in the notice or on an alternative date agreed to by the parent and teacher and fails to:
�������������������������(i)��attend the scheduled conference; or
�������������������������(ii)��before the scheduled conference, notify the teacher or an administrator of the campus to which the teacher is assigned that the parent will be unable to attend the conference; and
�������������(3)��in the case of a student with more than one parent, another parent of the student does not attend a parent-teacher conference scheduled in accordance with this subsection.
�������(b)��An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
�������(c)��An offense under this section may be prosecuted in a court in which an offense under Section 25.094(b) may be prosecuted.
�������(d)��It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the parent had a reasonable excuse for failing to attend the parent-teacher conference.
�������(e)��The clerk of the court in which an offense under this section is prosecuted shall transfer the proceeds of any fine collected by the court under this section to the school district that employs the teacher with whom the parent was scheduled to meet in the parent-teacher conference. The district may use funds collected under this section only to: �������������(1)��provide additional compensation to classroom teachers in the district; or
�������������(2)��purchase school supplies other than textbooks as defined by Section 31.002.
�������SECTION�2.��This Act takes effect September 1, 2007.

I don’t believe that I’ve ever been one to hold teachers’ solely accountable for student achievement since parent involvement is obviously a significant factor in the equation. And while I’m sure that there are many teachers who think that parents need to be held accountable for their actions (and many parents who deserve it), I’m not sure this is the way to do it.

Besides the various legalities involved and the burden it might place on a parent to present an affirmative defense, I don’t think this will really accomplish anything except maybe collect some additional funds for the classroom.

Think about it this way. A teacher schedules a parent-teacher conference. The parents don’t show up because a: their cultural or economic situation affects their ability to respond to the summons appropriately or b: they think it’s a waste of time. Now if the case is a, you have just added another burden on the parents to defend themselves. They can’t get time off of work (I’m sure there’s a bill to address that as well) but they will have to take time off to appear before a judge to explain why they can’t attend the conference.

Then there is case b. You now have a law that forces the parents to show up if for no other reason so that they avoid a fine. What do you think will be accomplish during that conference period? They will see the light and make sure junior does his homework every night? They will start enforcing a reasonable bed time for their kids or turn off the tv? Talk about a hostile audience.
I can just see this progressing until we have some version of NCLB for parents. As in the case of students, they will first be forced to spend a certain amount of time receiving “instruction.” Then someone will realize that it would be a good idea if they were to actually learn something from the instruction and will implement some sort of “no pass no play” rule for parents.

This may seem like such a simple solution to the problem of the lack of parental involvement. However, if we have learned anything in education reform, there are no simple solutions.



  1. The moron who introduced this bill should be voted out of office at the first available opportunity.

    Comment by James Parenti — February 1, 2007 @ 8:01 pm

  2. This Bill is ridiculous. In my day, Teachers taught schoolwork and
    Parents taught life. teachers can request a parent-teacher conference,
    but that should be the end of it. They should not be allowed to dictate to a parent when they come and go. Who is going to pay the parents home bills when the loose their job or come up short because of the day they had to take off to talk to the teacher. This bill will accomplish nothing more than make parents more hostile towards school and send more parent into the thought of homeschooling.

    Comment by Doug Meredith — February 1, 2007 @ 8:50 pm

  3. I’m not sure making it a criminal offense is the right move but something must be done to get parents more involved in their child’s education. I am a teacher and I constantly have “No Show” parents who provide no phone call, note or interest in informing me that they can’t make it to a conference. When a parent doesn’t call to reschedule or cancel it is taking time away from another possible conference…teachers only have 45 minutes a day to do all of their conferences, planning, etc. That time is valuable. If you don’t care about your child and you don’t plan on attending a conference then don’t schedule it….save that time for parents who actually care about the academic success of their child.

    In response to Doug who mentions that in his day teachers taugh schoolwork and parents taught life. That was true in my day, too. An unfortunate truth is that it ISN’T happening that way now. A large percentage of parents are not setting good examples for their children. If the parent of the student who refuses to do his homework, who constantly disrupts the class,and is failing miserably would get involved in their child’s education then the teachers could concentrate solely on academics.

    Comment by A teacher — February 11, 2007 @ 10:52 am

  4. I don’t think parents not showing up for conferences is strictly an education problem. I think it shows the general lack of courtesy and self-centerness in our society. We’ve just had two-thirds of families who signed up for an academic competition back out at the last minute. They had pre-paid and will lose their money. Unfortunately, we’re still on the hook for providing volunteers for the event.

    The sad thing is that I’m sure a lot of parents would look at your statement about the “no shows” and never see it as applying to them. They always have some excuse that they’ve internalized and really don’t see themselves that way.

    And while I know that a lot of these problems weren’t an issue in the past, it wasn’t just because they were more responsible parents. (I’m re-reading To Kill a Mockingbird, I’m not sure if the first grade teach had it that much easier than those of today.) I do think that it was much easier for schools to get problem students out of the classrooms than it is today.

    “When you succeed at keeping almost everyone in school, you must figure out ways to educate everyone you keep in school.” Dian Ravitch

    Comment by texased — February 16, 2007 @ 10:02 am

  5. I think this is a tool, Since the bill I have used it only as a tool to get the lower quality parents in. In this case that I used it as a tool the kid got motivated. If used properly it can be helpful. But anything abused is bad like the TAKS test, oh did I say that. –Walter

    Comment by Walter — October 17, 2007 @ 4:52 pm

  6. cuz we both thought,that love last foreve. Vaughan Domitilla.

    Comment by Vaughan Domitilla — October 21, 2007 @ 3:56 pm

  7. Great. I agree.

    Comment by Law Firm In Fort Bend County, TX — February 19, 2013 @ 3:16 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: